Credits: President Of Ukraine / Wikimedia Commons — CC0.
In this sequence of the war in Ukraine, Volodymyr Zelensky accuses Russia of “absolute cynicism.” Indeed, Moscow announced a truce around the May 9 commemorations. However, according to Ukrainian authorities and several consistent media reports, deadly strikes are continuing on Ukrainian territory. The heart of the issue is here: Russia wants to put on a show of de-escalation, but Ukraine says the facts observed on the ground are already undermining its significance.
Deadly Strikes As Moscow Talks About A Military Pause
The Ukrainian president denounced what he called “absolute cynicism.” This phrase was echoed notably by Franceinfo on May 5, after a new wave of Russian attacks. According to the Associated Press, citing Ukrainian authorities, drone and missile strikes carried out overnight killed at least five people and wounded 39, while targeting energy infrastructure in particular. The toll was still subject to change.
The most precise available information on May 5 places the main attacks in the Poltava and Kharkiv regions. AP reports that gas facilities were hit and that the attack on Poltava was denounced by Zelensky as “particularly vile,” because a second missile reportedly struck while rescuers were already on site. These claims come from the Ukrainian authorities and could not be independently verified.
Franceinfo reported at least five deaths in two Ukrainian regions, relying on local authorities. Libération, in its update published the same day, mentioned at least six deaths. In addition, the newspaper stressed how close these strikes were to the truce announced by Moscow. This difference is a reminder that casualty counts change quickly and must always be attributed carefully.
A Russian Truce Announced For May 8 And 9, In A Highly Political Context
The Russian proposal fits into the highly sensitive calendar of celebrations of the Soviet victory over Nazi Germany. According to the announcement relayed by the Kremlin and reported by AP, Russia proposed a unilateral truce. It applies to May 8 and 9. However, it warned that it would retaliate if the truce were violated. Moscow is thus trying to link this pause to a central moment in its historical and patriotic narrative.
For Ukraine, this timing is precisely the problem. Zelensky and his team say a credible ceasefire must not be just a brief pause. Indeed, it should not merely serve to secure a military celebration in Moscow. Still according to AP, Kyiv said it wanted to begin its own pause at the end of May 5, with the promise to “act reciprocally” depending on Russian behavior. In other words, Ukraine opposed the Russian truce with a conditional logic: no prior trust, only a response to actions.
This difference in timing highlights the core of the disagreement. Russia is emphasizing a short suspension, timed to May 9. Ukraine, by contrast, is arguing that real de-escalation should be immediate, verifiable, and broader. It is this gap between political symbolism and military reality that underpins the accusation of cynicism.
Why Kyiv Is Talking About Credibility Rather Than Simple Communication
Zelensky’s accusation is not only moral. It is also diplomatic. By condemning Moscow, the Ukrainian president is trying to convince his partners of the need to judge Russia by its actions. He stresses the importance of looking at whether the strikes continue or not. In his view, one should not rely solely on the announcement of a limited pause. In a war where information matters almost as much as the battlefield, each side tries to impose its own interpretation of the sequence.
Russia may present this truce as a humanitarian or political gesture. But Ukraine replies that the credibility of a ceasefire is measured by a real and immediate drop in attacks. In that logic, the strikes reported overnight before the diplomatic sequence become, for Kyiv, the clearest proof of Russian inconsistency.
The issue is all the more sensitive because the temporary ceasefires announced since the start of the war have often been greeted with skepticism. On May 5, nothing allowed anyone to say that a shared verification mechanism existed between the two sides. Without a common framework or independent monitoring, the truce remained above all a political announcement exposed to immediate dispute.
What This Sequence Says About The Ukraine War
The question raised by this Russia-Ukraine truce goes beyond the May 9 schedule. It touches on the very possibility of a ceasefire in Ukraine in a conflict where every initiative is read through the prism of propaganda, military power, and the search for international support. As long as Russian strikes in Ukraine continue to be reported at the very moment Moscow talks about a pause, Kyiv will have every reason to denounce a staged performance rather than real de-escalation.
As of May 5, the most solid conclusion remains that there is a central contradiction: Russia announced a truce with strong symbolic weight, but Ukraine says it continues to suffer the immediate military consequences. It is this contradiction, more than the phrase itself, that explains why Zelensky chose to speak of “absolute cynicism.”
Video unavailable