Credits: www.kaboompics.com / Pexels.
At the end of two days of state visit in Beijing, Friday, May 15, Donald Trump left with striking images. In addition, he obtained trade promises heavily touted by his camp. However, according to Reuters, the summit led to no major breakthrough on trade, Iran, Taiwan, rare earths, or advanced chips. On the Chinese side, the goal was mainly to establish a new political framework, described by Xinhua as a relationship of “constructive strategic stability,” without any major public concession.
Many Economic Announcements, But Still Hardly Verifiable
The U.S. president presented the visit as an economic success, mentioning in particular a possible Chinese purchase of 200 Boeing planes. He also mentioned talks on U.S. agricultural products and future lists of non-sensitive goods that could boost trade. But, at this stage, neither Boeing nor the U.S. authorities have released any document establishing the exact nature of these commitments. In addition, the Chinese authorities did not specify their timeline or whether they would be binding.
This distinction is essential. In political messaging, an intention to buy can be presented as an agreement. In industrial reality, a firm contract requires volumes, deadlines, financing terms, and identified deliveries. Yet the Trump-Xi summit ended without these elements being made public.
Reuters also reports that the market immediately tested the strength of the U.S. narrative. Boeing’s stock fell after the figure of 200 aircraft, highlighted by Donald Trump, emerged. In fact, this number proved lower than the expectations built up before the visit. In other words, even the most dramatic announcement was not enough to convince investors that a trade turning point had already been reached.
The same ambiguity surrounds the agricultural talks. According to Reuters and France 24 with AFP, the two sides discussed purchases and future mechanisms. However, there was no publication of final amounts or a detailed operational agreement. For the sectors concerned, this lack of precision matters just as much as the announcement itself: without a formal document, it remains impossible to know what is part of an advanced negotiation, a political promise, or a simple diplomatic display.
Taiwan, The Issue Xi Chose To Harden Publicly
The clearest point of the summit concerns neither trade nor energy, but Taiwan. According to the official Chinese readout published by Xinhua, Xi Jinping told Donald Trump that the Taiwan issue was crucial. In fact, it is “the most important” in the relationship between Beijing and Washington. He added that if it were mishandled, the two countries could face “clashes” or even “conflicts,” a diplomatic formulation that amounts to a direct warning at the highest level.
Also according to Xinhua, Xi directly opposed “Taiwan independence” and stability in the strait. This sequence gives Beijing a clear political result: having put Taiwan back at the center of the agenda, publicly, without making it seem like a secondary topic buried under trade issues.
Donald Trump, for his part, said after the talks that Xi Jinping had reiterated his opposition to any Taiwanese independence. The U.S. president said he had listened, without making any public commitment. He said he would soon decide on a pending U.S. arms sale to Taiwan. Based on the public statements available as of May 15, however, nothing allows us to conclude that U.S. policy has changed.
This caution is supported by the line maintained on the American side before and during the visit. CNBC and PBS relayed the position repeatedly stated by U.S. officials, including Marco Rubio. They say U.S. policy toward Taiwan has not changed. No official statement available Friday evening could also confirm a new U.S. decision on the still-pending arms sale.
Iran, The Strait of Hormuz, Rare Earths: The Major Issues Remain Open
Donald Trump also said the two leaders discussed Iran and freedom of navigation in the Strait of Hormuz. They discussed the need to prevent Tehran from obtaining nuclear weapons. However, Reuters and France 24 with AFP note that Beijing announced no specific mechanism. No detailed public commitment shows that it would pressure Iran beyond the general statements made during the visit.
Once again, diplomatic staging is not enough to create a verifiable result. For Europeans, however, the issue is very concrete. The Strait of Hormuz affects global energy flows and therefore prices, transport costs, and imported inflation. A China-U.S. summit that talks about Hormuz without setting out any identifiable measure does little to reduce the economic risk it claims to contain.
The same goes for rare earths and advanced semiconductors. These two issues were at the heart of expectations because they directly affect industry, electronics, autos, aerospace, and defense. Yet, at the end of the visit, no major public announcement clarified the restrictions. Neither on the Chinese side for critical materials, nor on the American side for advanced technologies.
What Xi Got, What Trump Can Still Claim
On a symbolic level, Donald Trump can argue that he reopened a high-level political channel with China. In addition, he secured new talking points favorable to trade. In a deteriorated bilateral relationship, that is not nothing. Ceremonies, mutual praise, and the promise of ongoing dialogue can help limit another verbal flare-up. At least temporarily, that could ease tensions between the two powers.
But the strongest reading of the summit is less flattering for Washington. Beijing clearly got what it was looking for: an orderly sequence and a calmer tone. In addition, access to a new generation of Nvidia chip technology was secured. The reinforced centrality of Taiwan and a discourse on “constructive strategic stability” are also noteworthy. This presents China as a responsible actor without forcing it to spell out immediate concessions. Donald Trump, meanwhile, leaves with announcements whose concrete meaning remains to be proven.
For France and Europe, this visit should therefore not be read as a simple episode of personal diplomacy. It is a reminder that the China-U.S. relationship continues to shape very real risks: energy prices, maritime route security, access to key components, the health of global trade, and the possibility of escalation around Taiwan. Thus, the Trump-Xi summit produced images of détente. But it has not yet delivered the economic and strategic guarantees that would give them lasting weight. Finally, it once again relegates Europe to its embarrassing role as a diplomatic dwarf, in the shadow of the two giants.
Video unavailable
